DJ7 wrote:
ddavids wrote:
The new norton 2010 does not use as many resources, but i'll still go for BitDefender
Hello bra,we only have to sell this at work,los die werk gedagtes nou.
Promoting the company maybru
Bitdefender all the way
| Opel Club Cape Town https://www.opelclubforum.co.za/ | |
| Best Anti-virus? https://www.opelclubforum.co.za/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=13411 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | chee_dee [ 10 Dec 2009, 11:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Best Anti-virus? |
I've had Norton for a year now and worked well, except for the fact that it slows down the pc... Need to get a new 1 in a couple a days. What else is out there and is better? Value all ur comments. Tx |
|
| Author: | $haggy [ 10 Dec 2009, 11:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
AVAST |
|
| Author: | DJ7 [ 10 Dec 2009, 11:46 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
Kasperski. |
|
| Author: | Mr Lupini [ 10 Dec 2009, 12:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
AVG or AVAST |
|
| Author: | Rebellious [ 10 Dec 2009, 14:20 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
DJ7 wrote: Kasperski. +1 Had it on my phone aswell, it is the bomb diggity. Kasperski or BitDefender. |
|
| Author: | Corsa Addict [ 10 Dec 2009, 14:39 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
& what about McAfee? |
|
| Author: | Dizzle [ 10 Dec 2009, 15:20 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
The new norton 2010 does not use as many resources, but i'll still go for BitDefender |
|
| Author: | DJ7 [ 10 Dec 2009, 15:58 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
ddavids wrote: The new norton 2010 does not use as many resources, but i'll still go for BitDefender Hello bra,we only have to sell this at work,los die werk gedagtes nou. |
|
| Author: | chee_dee [ 10 Dec 2009, 18:39 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
ddavids wrote: The new norton 2010 does not use as many resources, but i'll still go for BitDefender I have a friend who operates with pirate cd's... he swears by Bitdefender. He told me Norton slowed his PC down to almost 10mins per CD, burnt. With Bit defender he averages 2-3mins per burn. So I think that would be a good choice. |
|
| Author: | Dizzle [ 11 Dec 2009, 11:30 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
DJ7 wrote: ddavids wrote: The new norton 2010 does not use as many resources, but i'll still go for BitDefender Hello bra,we only have to sell this at work,los die werk gedagtes nou. Promoting the company maybru Bitdefender all the way
|
|
| Author: | Tino [ 11 Dec 2009, 12:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
Condom? |
|
| Author: | kokaine [ 11 Dec 2009, 14:25 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
I've been using Avast for years and I've never had a problem with it |
|
| Author: | chee_dee [ 12 Dec 2009, 00:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
kokaine wrote: I've been using Avast for years and I've never had a problem with it I'm not too clued up, but I would recon they all protect the same but the 1 that slows ur PC down the least, would be better... Not? |
|
| Author: | Dizzle [ 14 Dec 2009, 07:41 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
chee_dee wrote: kokaine wrote: I've been using Avast for years and I've never had a problem with it I'm not too clued up, but I would recon they all protect the same but the 1 that slows ur PC down the least, would be better... Not? Depends what package you looking at also, Full packages that includes anti-virus, firewall and spam filters normally slow your pc down a bit. to have good protection you have to make some sacrifices
|
|
| Author: | DJ7 [ 14 Dec 2009, 11:46 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
chee_dee wrote: kokaine wrote: I've been using Avast for years and I've never had a problem with it I'm not too clued up, but I would recon they all protect the same but the 1 that slows ur PC down the least, would be better... Not? Not true hey,not all protects the same.Do agree that some do use more resources than others,but that doesn't also make them better. |
|
| Author: | VulcanX [ 15 Dec 2009, 11:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best Anti-virus? |
DJ7 wrote: chee_dee wrote: kokaine wrote: I've been using Avast for years and I've never had a problem with it I'm not too clued up, but I would recon they all protect the same but the 1 that slows ur PC down the least, would be better... Not? Not true hey,not all protects the same.Do agree that some do use more resources than others,but that doesn't also make them better. Very accurate, and no antivirus is the best, just some pick up viruses that others dont. I still reckon Nod32 is the best on the performance and picks up a lot of viruses and stuff, i recommend that. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 2 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ | |